Ryzen 3 1200 vs Xeon X5675

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 3 1200

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon X5675

6 Cores12 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2011

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 3 1200 vs Xeon X5675 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 1200

4 / 4

6,407

0.0%

Athlon II X4 651

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

FX-8320E

Ryzen 3 3300U

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon X5675

6 / 12

6,418

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 1200 vs Xeon X5675 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 1200 vs Xeon X5675: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 1200

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,331 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $1,440 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1218.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.8 vs 4.5 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $1,440 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon X5675.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5675 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,407 vs 6,418).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5675, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.

Xeon X5675

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.5 vs 58.8 PassMark/$ ($1,440 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1200.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5675 better than Ryzen 3 1200?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5675 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 1200 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5675 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5675 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5675 is still the better call for a fresh build. Xeon X5675 comes in 1221.1% more expensive on MSRP at $1,440 MSRP versus $109 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 1200 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 6,407 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 1200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 3 1200 vs Xeon X5675 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 1200

The Ryzen 3 1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,407 points. Launch price was $109.

Xeon X5675

The Xeon X5675 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,418 points. Launch price was $162.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 1200 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon X5675 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon X5675 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1200 versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon X5675 — a 1.7% clock advantage for the Xeon X5675 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The Ryzen 3 1200 uses the Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X5675 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 1200 scores 6,407 against the Xeon X5675's 6,418 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon X5675. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 1200 vs 12288 kB (total) on the Xeon X5675.

Feature	Ryzen 3 1200	Xeon X5675
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.46 GHz+2%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+1%	3.06 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12288 kB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	6,407	6,418
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,013	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,000	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 1200 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5675 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen 3 1200 versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5675 — the Ryzen 3 1200 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 3 1200) vs 3 (Xeon X5675). Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470 (Ryzen 3 1200) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5675).

Feature	Ryzen 3 1200	Xeon X5675
Socket	AM4	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+100%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	3+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 3 1200 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1200) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5675). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 1200 targets Budget, Xeon X5675 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5675 rivals Core i7-980X.

Feature	Ryzen 3 1200	Xeon X5675
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Budget	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 3 1200 was priced at $109, while the Xeon X5675 came in at $1440. On launch pricing ($109 vs $1440), Ryzen 3 1200 was $1331 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 1200 delivers 58.8 pts/$ vs 4.5 pts/$ for the Xeon X5675 — making the Ryzen 3 1200 the 171.8% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 3 1200	Xeon X5675
MSRP	$109-92%	$1440
Performance per Dollar	58.8+1207%	4.5
Release Date	2017	2011

Search Ryzen 3 1200 on Amazon

Search Xeon X5675 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.