Ryzen 3 PRO 210
VS
Xeon E-2334

Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs Xeon E-2334

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 210

4 Cores8 Thrd4 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon E-2334

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E-2334

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
4202%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
793%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
705%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
545%
#220
Xeon 6520P
MSRP: $1295|Avg: $1295
100%
#221
Xeon Gold 6314U
MSRP: $2977|Avg: N/A
99%
#222
Xeon E-2478
MSRP: $568|Avg: $269
99%
#223
Xeon W-1390
MSRP: $494|Avg: $400
98%
#225
Xeon W-1250
MSRP: $285|Avg: $333
97%
#268
Xeon E-2334
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#282
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
MSRP: $189|Avg: $50
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E-2334 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightRyzen 3 PRO 210Xeon E-2334
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Rocket Lake-E (2021) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 ($30), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($30 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightRyzen 3 PRO 210Xeon E-2334
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 PRO 210 and Xeon E-2334

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 210

The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB + 8 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,155 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E-2334

The Xeon E-2334 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 12,364 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 and Xeon E-2334 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2334 — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2334 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E-2334 uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 scores 12,155 against the Xeon E-2334's 12,364 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon E-2334. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2334.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 210Xeon E-2334
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.7 GHz
4.8 GHz+2%
Base Clock
3 GHz
3.4 GHz+13%
L3 Cache
8 MB
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
512K (per core)
Process
4 nm-71%
14 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)
Rocket Lake-E (2021)
PassMark
12,155
12,364+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 uses the FP7/FP7r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2334 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 210Xeon E-2334
Socket
FP7/FP7r2
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0