
Ryzen 3 PRO 210

Xeon W-10855M
Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs Xeon W-10855M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs Xeon W-10855M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs Xeon W-10855M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 3 PRO 210
2025Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-10855M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,155 vs 12,249).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-10855M, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 4W vs 1.5W.
Xeon W-10855M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 4W, a 3W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $118 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 210 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 PRO 210 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-10855M better than Ryzen 3 PRO 210?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs Xeon W-10855M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 3 PRO 210
The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB + 8 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,155 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon W-10855M
The Xeon W-10855M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,249 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W-10855M offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W-10855M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 versus 4.9 GHz on the Xeon W-10855M — a 4.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-10855M (base: 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-10855M uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 scores 12,155 against the Xeon W-10855M's 12,249 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon W-10855M. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs 12 MB on the Xeon W-10855M.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 210 | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 4.9 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+7% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 12 MB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+167% | 1.5 MB |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) | Comet Lake-H (2020) |
| PassMark | 12,155 | 12,249 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 uses the FP7/FP7r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-10855M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 210 | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 was priced at $0, while the Xeon W-10855M came in at $118. On launch pricing ($0 vs $118), Ryzen 3 PRO 210 was $118 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 210 | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $118 |
| Performance per Dollar | — | 103.8 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













