Ryzen 3 PRO 210
VS
Xeon W-10855M

Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs Xeon W-10855M

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 210

4 Cores8 Thrd4 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon W-10855M

6 Cores12 Thrd1.5 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-10855M

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
2002%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
378%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
336%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
259%
#65
EPYC 4364P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $334
98%
#66
EPYC 4585PX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $826
97%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
95%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
84%
#82
Xeon W-10855M
MSRP: $118|Avg: $43
100%
#85
Opteron 6234
MSRP: $377|Avg: $141
98%
#86
Xeon E7330
MSRP: $64|Avg: $60
98%
#88
Opteron 6212
MSRP: $266|Avg: N/A
96%
#90
Opteron 4334
MSRP: $204|Avg: $130
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($43) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W-10855M is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightRyzen 3 PRO 210Xeon W-10855M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($30)
⚠️ Higher cost ($43)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake-H (2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 ($30), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($13 less, 30% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightRyzen 3 PRO 210Xeon W-10855M
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+42%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30)
⚠️ Higher cost ($43)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 PRO 210 and Xeon W-10855M

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 210

The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB + 8 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,155 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon W-10855M

The Xeon W-10855M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,249 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W-10855M offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W-10855M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 versus 4.9 GHz on the Xeon W-10855M — a 4.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-10855M (base: 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-10855M uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 scores 12,155 against the Xeon W-10855M's 12,249 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon W-10855M. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs 12 MB on the Xeon W-10855M.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 210Xeon W-10855M
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
4.7 GHz
4.9 GHz+4%
Base Clock
3 GHz+7%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB
12 MB+50%
L2 Cache
4 MB+167%
1.5 MB
Process
4 nm-71%
14 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)
Comet Lake-H (2020)
PassMark
12,155
12,249
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 uses the FP7/FP7r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-10855M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 210Xeon W-10855M
Socket
FP7/FP7r2
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Xeon W-10855M debuted at $118. At current prices ($30 vs $43), the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 is $13 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 delivers 405.2 pts/$ vs 284.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-10855M — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 the 34.9% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 210Xeon W-10855M
MSRP
$0-100%
$118
Avg Price (30d)
$30-30%
$43
Performance per Dollar
405.2+42%
284.9
Release Date
2025
2020