
Ryzen 3 PRO 210

Xeon E5-2687W v2
Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs Xeon E5-2687W v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs Xeon E5-2687W v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs Xeon E5-2687W v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 3 PRO 210
2025Why buy it
- β Draws 4W instead of 150W, a 146W reduction.
- β Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2687W v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (12,155 vs 12,301).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2687W v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon E5-2687W v2
2013Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $2,112 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 210 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β3650% higher power demand at 150W vs 4W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA2011, while Ryzen 3 PRO 210 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2687W v2 better than Ryzen 3 PRO 210?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs Xeon E5-2687W v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 3 PRO 210
The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023β2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MBΒ +Β 8 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,155 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2687W v2
The Xeon E5-2687W v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,301 points. Launch price was $1,605.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2687W v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Xeon E5-2687W v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2687W v2 β a 16.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023β2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2687W v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 scores 12,155 against the Xeon E5-2687W v2's 12,301 β a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2687W v2. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2687W v2.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 210 | Xeon E5-2687W v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+18% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+13% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 20 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-82% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023β2025) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 12,155 | 12,301+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 uses the FP7/FP7r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2687W v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 210 | Xeon E5-2687W v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 was priced at $0, while the Xeon E5-2687W v2 came in at $2112. On launch pricing ($0 vs $2112), Ryzen 3 PRO 210 was $2112 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 210 | Xeon E5-2687W v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2112 |
| Performance per Dollar | β | 5.8 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













