Ryzen 3 PRO 210
VS
Xeon E5-2692 v2

Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 210

4 Cores8 Thrd4 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2692 v2

12 Cores24 Thrd100 WWMax: 3 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2692 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
4287%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
809%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
719%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
556%
#223
Xeon W-1390
MSRP: $494|Avg: $400
100%
#225
Xeon W-1250
MSRP: $285|Avg: $333
99%
#226
EPYC 9135
MSRP: $1214|Avg: $95
98%
#227
Xeon E-2378
MSRP: $362|Avg: $562
97%
#228
Xeon w3-2525
MSRP: $609|Avg: $800
97%
#275
Xeon E5-2692 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#282
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
MSRP: $189|Avg: $50
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 (2025) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen 3 PRO 210Xeon E5-2692 v2
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) / 4 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2692 v2 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen 3 PRO 210Xeon E5-2692 v2
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 PRO 210 and Xeon E5-2692 v2

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 210

The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB + 8 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,155 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-2692 v2

The Xeon E5-2692 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,119 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2692 v2 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2692 v2 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2692 v2 — a 44.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2692 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 scores 12,155 against the Xeon E5-2692 v2's 12,119 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 210. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2692 v2.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 210Xeon E5-2692 v2
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
12 / 24+200%
Boost Clock
4.7 GHz+57%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+36%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB
30 MB (total)+275%
L2 Cache
4 MB+1500%
256 kB (per core)
Process
4 nm-82%
22 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark
12,155
12,119
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 uses the FP7/FP7r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2692 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 210Xeon E5-2692 v2
Socket
FP7/FP7r2
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0