CPU
GPU
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Xeon W3670
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3670
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G | Xeon W3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($52) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($250) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen+ (2018−2019) / 12 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Gulftown (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G | Xeon W3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+386%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($52) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($250) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Xeon W3670
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,499 points. Launch price was $149.
Xeon W3670
The Xeon W3670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,424 points. Launch price was $295.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon W3670 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W3670 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W3670 — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon W3670 uses Gulftown (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G scores 6,499 against the Xeon W3670's 6,424 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W3670.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G | Xeon W3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+16% | 3.46 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-63% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Gulftown (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 6,499+1% | 6,424 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3670 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G | Xeon W3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G) / not specified (Xeon W3670). The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Xeon W3670 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G | Xeon W3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 8 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G launched at $89 MSRP, while the Xeon W3670 debuted at $250. At current prices ($52 vs $250), the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is $198 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G delivers 125.0 pts/$ vs 25.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W3670 — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G the 131.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G | Xeon W3670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $89-64% | $250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $52-79% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 125.0+386% | 25.7 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Xeon W3670
