Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Xeon W3670

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Xeon W3670 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

4 / 4

6,499

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon W3670

6 / 12

6,424

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Xeon W3670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Xeon W3670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

2019

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $161 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 184.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.0 vs 25.7 PassMark/$ ($89 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W3670 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3670, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.

Xeon W3670

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,424 vs 6,499).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.7 vs 73.0 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G better than Xeon W3670?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W3670 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G comes in $161 cheaper on MSRP at $89 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon W3670 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 184.2% better value on MSRP (73.0 vs 25.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Xeon W3670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,499 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon W3670

The Xeon W3670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,424 points. Launch price was $295.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon W3670 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W3670 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W3670 — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon W3670 uses Gulftown (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G scores 6,499 against the Xeon W3670's 6,424 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W3670.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G	Xeon W3670
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+16%	3.46 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+12%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	12 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	12 nm-63%	32 nm
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	Gulftown (2010−2011)
PassMark	6,499+1%	6,424

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3670 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G	Xeon W3670
Socket	AM4	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G) / not specified (Xeon W3670). The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Xeon W3670 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G targets Desktop.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G	Xeon W3670
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Radeon Vega 8	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was priced at $89, while the Xeon W3670 came in at $250. On launch pricing ($89 vs $250), Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was $161 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G delivers 73.0 pts/$ vs 25.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W3670 — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G the 95.9% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G	Xeon W3670
MSRP	$89-64%	$250
Performance per Dollar	73.0+184%	25.7
Release Date	2019	2010

Search Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G on Amazon

Search Xeon W3670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.