
Ryzen 5 2400G

Xeon E5-4650
Ryzen 5 2400G vs Xeon E5-4650 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 2400G vs Xeon E5-4650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 2400G vs Xeon E5-4650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 2400G
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,447 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $3,616 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2073.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 2.4 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $3,616 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon RX Vega 11, while Xeon E5-4650 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4650, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon E5-4650
2012Why buy it
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,599 vs 8,734).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 51.7 PassMark/$ ($3,616 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 2400G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2400G.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 2400G better than Xeon E5-4650?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 2400G vs Xeon E5-4650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 2400G
The Ryzen 5 2400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $169.

Xeon E5-4650
The Xeon E5-4650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,599 points. Launch price was $799.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 2400G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4650 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-4650 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2400G versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4650 — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 2400G (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2400G uses the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4650 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2400G scores 8,734 against the Xeon E5-4650's 8,599 — a 1.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 2400G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2400G vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-4650.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2400G | Xeon E5-4650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+18% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+33% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 20480 kB (total)+400% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 8,734+2% | 8,599 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 4,800 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,040 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,250 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 2400G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4650 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2400G | Xeon E5-4650 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 2400G) / not specified (Xeon E5-4650). The Ryzen 5 2400G includes integrated graphics (Radeon RX Vega 11), while the Xeon E5-4650 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 2400G targets Entry Gaming Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2400G | Xeon E5-4650 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon RX Vega 11 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Entry Gaming Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 2400G was priced at $169, while the Xeon E5-4650 came in at $3616. On launch pricing ($169 vs $3616), Ryzen 5 2400G was $3447 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 2400G delivers 51.7 pts/$ vs 2.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4650 — making the Ryzen 5 2400G the 182.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2400G | Xeon E5-4650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-95% | $3616 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+2054% | 2.4 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














