Ryzen 5 2600 vs Xeon E5-2675 V3

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Xeon E5-2675 V3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 2600

6 / 12

13,145

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2675 V3

16 / 32

13,180

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Xeon E5-2675 V3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Xeon E5-2675 V3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 2600

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,601 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,800 MSRP).
✅Delivers 802.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.1 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,800 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 110W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2675 V3.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2675 V3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,145 vs 13,180).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2675 V3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Xeon E5-2675 V3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 66.1 PassMark/$ ($1,800 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌69.2% higher power demand at 110W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2600.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2675 V3 better than Ryzen 5 2600?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2675 V3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 2600 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2675 V3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2675 V3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2675 V3 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 2600 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-2675 V3 comes in 804.5% more expensive on MSRP at $1,800 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 2600 is also 802.1% better value on MSRP (66.1 vs 7.3 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 2600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Xeon E5-2675 V3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 2600

The Ryzen 5 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,145 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon E5-2675 V3

The Xeon E5-2675 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 13,180 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 2600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2675 V3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2675 V3 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600 versus 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2675 V3 — a 51.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 2600 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2600 uses the Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2675 V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2600 scores 13,145 against the Xeon E5-2675 V3's 13,180 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2675 V3. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600 vs 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2675 V3.

Feature	Ryzen 5 2600	Xeon E5-2675 V3
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+70%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+89%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	40 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	3 MB	256K (per core)+8433%
Process	12 nm-45%	22 nm
Architecture	Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	13,145	13,180
Cinebench R23 Multi	6,344	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,163	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,893	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 2600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2675 V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 2600	Xeon E5-2675 V3
Socket	AM4	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 2600) / not specified (Xeon E5-2675 V3). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 2600 targets General Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 2600 rivals Core i5-9400.

Feature	Ryzen 5 2600	Xeon E5-2675 V3
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	Yes	—
Target Use	General Productivity	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 5 2600 was priced at $199, while the Xeon E5-2675 V3 came in at $1800. On launch pricing ($199 vs $1800), Ryzen 5 2600 was $1601 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 2600 delivers 66.1 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2675 V3 — making the Ryzen 5 2600 the 160.1% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 5 2600	Xeon E5-2675 V3
MSRP	$199-89%	$1800
Performance per Dollar	66.1+805%	7.3
Release Date	2018	2014

Search Ryzen 5 2600 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2675 V3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.