Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Ryzen 7 260 vs Ryzen 7 3700X

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Ryzen 7 260

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019
Ryzen family
·······
Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 260 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 260
8 / 16
28,339
+26.3%
brand logoRyzen Embedded V2718
brand logoRyzen 5 6600HS
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 1950
brand logoRyzen 7 8840HS
brand logoRyzen 9 7845HX
brand logoRyzen 9 9955HX3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
Ryzen 7 3700X
8 / 16
22,430
0.0%
brand logoRyzen 3 PRO 7330U
brand logoRyzen 7 PRO 4750U
brand logoRyzen 7 4980U
brand logoRyzen 5 PRO 220
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen 9 9900X3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 260 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Ryzen 7 260
low265 FPS
medium240 FPS
high202 FPS
ultra174 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low200 FPS
medium163 FPS
high137 FPS
ultra110 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Ryzen 7 260
low486 FPS
medium399 FPS
high341 FPS
ultra304 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low561 FPS
medium525 FPS
high428 FPS
ultra383 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Ryzen 7 260
low708 FPS
medium708 FPS
high708 FPS
ultra623 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low561 FPS
medium561 FPS
high561 FPS
ultra561 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Ryzen 7 260
low708 FPS
medium708 FPS
high708 FPS
ultra708 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low561 FPS
medium561 FPS
high561 FPS
ultra561 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Ryzen 7 260
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Ryzen 7 260
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra286 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Ryzen 7 260
low316 FPS
medium238 FPS
high207 FPS
ultra183 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low293 FPS
medium221 FPS
high193 FPS
ultra173 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Ryzen 7 260
low290 FPS
medium252 FPS
high192 FPS
ultra151 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low298 FPS
medium265 FPS
high209 FPS
ultra173 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Ryzen 7 260
low316 FPS
medium261 FPS
high219 FPS
ultra191 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low350 FPS
medium300 FPS
high258 FPS
ultra220 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Ryzen 7 260
low240 FPS
medium221 FPS
high184 FPS
ultra171 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low236 FPS
medium220 FPS
high186 FPS
ultra174 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Ryzen 7 260 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 260

2025

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 108.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 142.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
  • ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
  • ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 260 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 28,339).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 142.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
  • ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 260 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 260 better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Yes. Ryzen 7 260 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 26.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 260 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 260 is the stronger fit. You are getting 26.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 260 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 260 comes in $130 cheaper on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 108.9% better value on MSRP (142.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 260 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 7 260 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 7 260

The Ryzen 7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,339 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 260 and Ryzen 7 3700X share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 260 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 260 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 260 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 260 scores 28,339 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 23.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 260. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 260 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

FeatureRyzen 7 260Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+16%
4.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+6%
3.6 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
32 MB+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
512K (per core)+51100%
Process
4 nm-43%
7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark
28,339+26%
22,430
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 260 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 260 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 260 supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 260) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureRyzen 7 260Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket
FP8
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600+75%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
128 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
24+20%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 260) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The Ryzen 7 260 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 260 targets Mobile.

FeatureRyzen 7 260Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon 780M
—
Unlocked
No
—
AVX-512
Yes
—
Virtualization
AMD-V
—
Target Use
Mobile
—
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 260 was priced at $199, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($199 vs $329), Ryzen 7 260 was $130 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 260 delivers 142.4 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 260 the 70.5% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 7 260Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP
$199-40%
$329
Performance per Dollar
142.4+109%
68.2
Release Date
2025
2019
Search Ryzen 7 260 on AmazonSearch Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.