Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 vs Xeon D-1733NT

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 vs Xeon D-1733NT Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

8 / 16

14,699

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon D-1733NT

8 / 16

14,849

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 vs Xeon D-1733NT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 vs Xeon D-1733NT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,699 vs 14,849).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.7 vs 49.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌22.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 53W.

Xeon D-1733NT

2022

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Delivers 10.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.5 vs 44.7 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 53W instead of 65W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1733NT better than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1733NT makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1733NT is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1733NT is the better buy right now. Xeon D-1733NT comes in $29 cheaper on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 8.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 10.8% better value on MSRP (49.5 vs 44.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1733NT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 vs Xeon D-1733NT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,699 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon D-1733NT

The Xeon D-1733NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,849 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Xeon D-1733NT share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1733NT — a 17.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is built on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 scores 14,699 against the Xeon D-1733NT's 14,849 — a 1% lead for the Xeon D-1733NT. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 vs 15 MB on the Xeon D-1733NT.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700	Xeon D-1733NT
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+19%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+50%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)+7%	15 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	—
PassMark	14,699	14,849+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1733NT uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700	Xeon D-1733NT
Socket	AM4	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 was priced at $329, while the Xeon D-1733NT came in at $300. On launch pricing ($329 vs $300), Xeon D-1733NT was $29 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 delivers 44.7 pts/$ vs 49.5 pts/$ for the Xeon D-1733NT — making the Xeon D-1733NT the 10.2% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700	Xeon D-1733NT
MSRP	$329	$300-9%
Performance per Dollar	44.7	49.5+11%
Release Date	2017	2022

Search Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 on Amazon

Search Xeon D-1733NT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.