Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 vs Xeon E5-2680 v3
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2680 v3
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 | Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($60) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($212) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 | Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+249%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($60) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($212) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Xeon E5-2680 v3
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,699 points. Launch price was $149.
Xeon E5-2680 v3
The Xeon E5-2680 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 14,864 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2680 v3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2680 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2680 v3 — a 11.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2680 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 scores 14,699 against the Xeon E5-2680 v3's 14,864 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2680 v3. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2680 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 | Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+12% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+20% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+88% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 14,699 | 14,864+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2680 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 | Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 1700) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2680 v3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2680 v3 targets Server.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 | Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2680 v3 debuted at $1745. At current prices ($60 vs $212), the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is $152 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 delivers 245.0 pts/$ vs 70.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2680 v3 — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 the 111% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 | Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-81% | $1745 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-72% | $212 |
| Performance per Dollar | 245.0+250% | 70.1 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Xeon E5-2680 v3
