Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 vs Xeon E5-2658A V3

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 vs Xeon E5-2658A V3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

8 / 16

14,699

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2658A V3

12 / 24

14,879

+1.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 vs Xeon E5-2658A V3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 vs Xeon E5-2658A V3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,503 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,832 MSRP).
✅Delivers 450.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.7 vs 8.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,832 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,699 vs 14,879).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2658A V3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2658A V3

2015

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.1 vs 44.7 PassMark/$ ($1,832 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 better than Xeon E5-2658A V3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2658A V3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2658A V3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 comes in $1,503 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $1,832 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2658A V3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.2% better PassMark. It is also 450.1% better value on MSRP (44.7 vs 8.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 vs Xeon E5-2658A V3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,699 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2658A V3

The Xeon E5-2658A V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 14,879 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2658A V3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2658A V3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2658A V3 — a 24.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2658A V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 scores 14,699 against the Xeon E5-2658A V3's 14,879 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2658A V3. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2658A V3.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700	Xeon E5-2658A V3
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+28%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+36%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	14,699	14,879+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2658A V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700	Xeon E5-2658A V3
Socket	AM4	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	—	768 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 1700) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2658A V3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2658A V3 targets Server.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700	Xeon E5-2658A V3
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 was priced at $329, while the Xeon E5-2658A V3 came in at $1832. On launch pricing ($329 vs $1832), Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 was $1503 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 delivers 44.7 pts/$ vs 8.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2658A V3 — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 the 138.5% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700	Xeon E5-2658A V3
MSRP	$329-82%	$1832
Performance per Dollar	44.7+452%	8.1
Release Date	2017	2015

Search Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2658A V3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.