Ryzen 7 PRO 250 vs Core i9-9900X
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
Core i9-9900X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 PRO 250
Performance Per Dollar Core i9-9900X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 | Core i9-9900X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($380) | ✅ More affordable ($300) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 | Core i9-9900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+26%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($380) | ✅ More affordable ($300) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 250 and Core i9-9900X
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
The Ryzen 7 PRO 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,789 points. Launch price was $299.
Core i9-9900X
The Core i9-9900X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,655 points. Launch price was $989.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 PRO 250 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-9900X offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-9900X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-9900X — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 250 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Core i9-9900X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 scores 21,789 against the Core i9-9900X's 21,655 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 250. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 | Core i9-9900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+13% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.5 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 19.25 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 21,789 | 21,655 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 13,985 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,459 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,475 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 250 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-9900X uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 | Core i9-9900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 44 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 250) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-9900X).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 | Core i9-9900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 PRO 250 launched at $400 MSRP, while the Core i9-9900X debuted at $989. At current prices ($380 vs $300), the Core i9-9900X is $80 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 delivers 57.3 pts/$ vs 72.2 pts/$ for the Core i9-9900X — making the Core i9-9900X the 22.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 | Core i9-9900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400-60% | $989 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $300-21% |
| Performance per Dollar | 57.3 | 72.2+26% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 7 PRO 250 and Core i9-9900X
