
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5515+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 165W, a 157W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 23 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP7/FP8, while Xeon Gold 5515+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 5515+
2023Why buy it
- ✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (23 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of FP7/FP8 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,359 vs 26,852).
- ❌1962.5% higher power demand at 165W vs 8W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023Xeon Gold 5515+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 165W, a 157W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (23 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of FP7/FP8 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 23 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP7/FP8, while Xeon Gold 5515+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,359 vs 26,852).
- ❌1962.5% higher power demand at 165W vs 8W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS better than Xeon Gold 5515+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS | Xeon Gold 5515+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS | Xeon Gold 5515+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 426 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 331 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 446 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 331 FPS |
| ultra | 283 FPS | 290 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 251 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 205 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS | Xeon Gold 5515+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 671 FPS | 659 FPS |
| medium | 671 FPS | 659 FPS |
| high | 647 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 659 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 671 FPS | 659 FPS |
| medium | 637 FPS | 659 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 572 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 355 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS | Xeon Gold 5515+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 671 FPS | 659 FPS |
| medium | 671 FPS | 659 FPS |
| high | 671 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 671 FPS | 614 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 671 FPS | 659 FPS |
| medium | 671 FPS | 659 FPS |
| high | 660 FPS | 587 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 495 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 457 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 371 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon Gold 5515+


Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 26,852 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 5515+
Xeon Gold 5515+
The Xeon Gold 5515+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,359 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon Gold 5515+ share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5515+ — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5515+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS scores 26,852 against the Xeon Gold 5515+'s 26,359 — a 1.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS vs 22.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5515+.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS | Xeon Gold 5515+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+24% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+19% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 22.5 MB (total)+41% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 26,852+2% | 26,359 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses the FP7/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5515+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS | Xeon Gold 5515+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP8 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












