Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon w3-2525

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon w3-2525 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

8 / 16

29,088

+1.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Xeon w3-2525

8 / 16

28,641

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon w3-2525 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon w3-2525: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 175W, a 130W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon w3-2525 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,037 vs 15,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 23 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w3-2525, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon w3-2525

2024

Why buy it

✅+35.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (23 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $609 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌288.9% higher power demand at 175W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w3-2525 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon w3-2525 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w3-2525 is the stronger fit. You are getting 35.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 40.6% larger total L3 cache (23 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w3-2525 is the better buy right now. Xeon w3-2525 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $609 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 35.9% better Geekbench multi-core. The compromise is that Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 12.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (47.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w3-2525 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 40.6% larger total L3 cache (23 MB vs 16 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon w3-2525 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,088 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon w3-2525

The Xeon w3-2525 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 175 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,641 points. Launch price was $609.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and Xeon w3-2525 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon w3-2525 — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w3-2525 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 29,088 against the Xeon w3-2525's 28,641 — a 1.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,332 vs 2,000, a 15.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,037 vs 15,000 (30.4% advantage for the Xeon w3-2525). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs 22.5 MB on the Xeon w3-2525.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS	Xeon w3-2525
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+13%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+9%	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	22.5 MB+41%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point (2024−2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	29,088+2%	28,641
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,930	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,332+17%	2,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,037	15,000+36%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w3-2525 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS versus DDR5-4400 on the Xeon w3-2525 — the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports 27.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w3-2525 supports up to 2 TB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs 4 (Xeon w3-2525). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs 64 (Xeon w3-2525) — the Xeon w3-2525 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) and W790 (Xeon w3-2525).

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS	Xeon w3-2525
Socket	FP7	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+27%	DDR5-4400
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	2 TB+700%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w3-2525). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon w3-2525 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS targets Enterprise Performance Laptop, Xeon w3-2525 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H; Xeon w3-2525 rivals Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS	Xeon w3-2525
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon 780M	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Enterprise Performance Laptop	Workstation