Ryzen 9 3900
VS
Core Ultra 7 255H

Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core Ultra 7 255H

AMD

Ryzen 9 3900

12 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 255H

16 Cores16 Thrd26 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 3900

#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
1049%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
316%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
250%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
219%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
125%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
124%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
113%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
113%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
111%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
108%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
107%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
106%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
105%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
103%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
101%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
100%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
99%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
99%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
95%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
93%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
92%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
92%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
90%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
90%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
89%
#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
89%
#29
Core Ultra 7 265F
MSRP: $369|Avg: $276
87%
#30
Core i5-12400F
MSRP: $174|Avg: $110
87%
#31
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
86%
#32
Ryzen 7 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $100
86%
#33
Core i3-10100F
MSRP: $88|Avg: $50
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 255H

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
112%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
110%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
106%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
104%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
102%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
102%
#181
Core Ultra 7 255H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
98%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
90%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core Ultra 7 255H (2025) utilizes 5 nm technology and DDR5-6400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen 9 3900Core Ultra 7 255H
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 9 3900 (2019) relies on 7 nm, 12 nm technology and DDR4-3200, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen 9 3900Core Ultra 7 255H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 3900 and Core Ultra 7 255H

AMD

Ryzen 9 3900

The Ryzen 9 3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 30,588 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 255H

The Core Ultra 7 255H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,932 points. Launch price was $514.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 3900 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 255H offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 255H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3900 versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255H — a 17% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H (base: 3.1 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Ryzen 9 3900 uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 255H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 3900 scores 30,588 against the Core Ultra 7 255H's 30,932 — a 1.1% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255H. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,713 vs 2,800, a 48.2% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,983 vs 15,700 (35.4% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3900 vs 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 255H.

FeatureRyzen 9 3900Core Ultra 7 255H
Cores / Threads
12 / 24
16 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
5.1 GHz+19%
Base Clock
3.1 GHz
4.4 GHz+42%
L3 Cache
64 MB+167%
24 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm, 12 nm
5 nm-29%
Architecture
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
PassMark
30,588
30,932+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
17,700
Geekbench 6 Single
1,713
2,800+63%
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,983
15,700+43%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 3900 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 255H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 3900 versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 255H — the Core Ultra 7 255H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 3900) vs 28 (Core Ultra 7 255H) — the Core Ultra 7 255H offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 3900) and HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 7 255H).

FeatureRyzen 9 3900Core Ultra 7 255H
Socket
AM4
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
DDR5-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
24
28+17%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 3900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 3900) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 255H). The Core Ultra 7 255H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 140T), while the Ryzen 9 3900 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 3900 targets Workstation Desktop (low power), Core Ultra 7 255H targets High-End Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 3900 rivals Core i9-9900.

FeatureRyzen 9 3900Core Ultra 7 255H
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Workstation Desktop (low power)
High-End Laptop