Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i7-13650HX
Ryzen 9 3900
Core i7-13650HX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 3900
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-13650HX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 9 3900 | Core i7-13650HX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-HX (2023) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 9 3900 | Core i7-13650HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 3900 and Core i7-13650HX
Ryzen 9 3900
The Ryzen 9 3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 30,588 points. Launch price was $499.
Core i7-13650HX
The Core i7-13650HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,538 points. Launch price was $485.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 3900 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Core i7-13650HX offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-13650HX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3900 versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-13650HX — a 13% clock advantage for the Core i7-13650HX (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 9 3900 uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Core i7-13650HX uses Raptor Lake-HX (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 3900 scores 30,588 against the Core i7-13650HX's 30,538 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 3900. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,700 vs 20,999 (17% advantage for the Core i7-13650HX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,713 vs 2,524, a 38.3% lead for the Core i7-13650HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,983 vs 16,200 (38.4% advantage for the Core i7-13650HX). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3900 vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13650HX.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900 | Core i7-13650HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 14 / 20+17% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.9 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+19% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+167% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) |
| PassMark | 30,588 | 30,538 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,700 | 20,999+19% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,713 | 2,524+47% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,983 | 16,200+48% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 3900 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-13650HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 3900 versus DDR5-4800 on the Core i7-13650HX — the Core i7-13650HX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13650HX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 3900) vs 20 (Core i7-13650HX) — the Ryzen 9 3900 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 3900) and HM770,WM790 (Core i7-13650HX).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900 | Core i7-13650HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA1964 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 3900) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13650HX). The Core i7-13650HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)), while the Ryzen 9 3900 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 3900 targets Workstation Desktop (low power), Core i7-13650HX targets High-end Content Creation Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 3900 rivals Core i9-9900; Core i7-13650HX rivals Ryzen 7 7840HX.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900 | Core i7-13650HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Workstation Desktop (low power) | High-end Content Creation Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 9 3900 and Core i7-13650HX
