Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 vs Xeon Platinum 8168

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 vs Xeon Platinum 8168 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

12 / 24

32,841

+1.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon Platinum 8168

24 / 48

32,373

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 vs Xeon Platinum 8168 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 vs Xeon Platinum 8168: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 205W, a 177W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Xeon Platinum 8168 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 33 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8168, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $500 MSRP, while Xeon Platinum 8168 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Platinum 8168

2017

Why buy it

✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (32,373 vs 32,841).
❌632.1% higher power demand at 205W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 better than Xeon Platinum 8168?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Platinum 8168 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is the better buy right now. Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $500 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (65.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 24/48. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 vs Xeon Platinum 8168 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,841 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Platinum 8168

The Xeon Platinum 8168 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 32,373 points. Launch price was $5,890.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8168 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8168 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8168 — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 uses the Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8168 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 scores 32,841 against the Xeon Platinum 8168's 32,373 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 vs 33 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8168.

Feature	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370	Xeon Platinum 8168
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	24 / 48+100%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+38%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.7 GHz+35%
L3 Cache	16 MB	33 MB+106%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	24 MB+2300%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	32,841+1%	32,373

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8168 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5X-8000 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 versus 2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8168 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 supports 200.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8168 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8168). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8168) — the Xeon Platinum 8168 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370	Xeon Platinum 8168
Socket	FP8	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5X-8000+200%	2666
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	768 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8168). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the Xeon Platinum 8168 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 targets Mobile Workstation / AI. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8168 rivals EPYC 7501.