Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
Xeon Platinum 8270
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 vs Xeon Platinum 8270 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 vs Xeon Platinum 8270 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 vs Xeon Platinum 8270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,905 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $7,405 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1347.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 65.7 vs 4.5 PassMark/$ ($500 MSRP vs $7,405 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 205W, a 177W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Xeon Platinum 8270 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (32,841 vs 33,602).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8270, which brings 26 cores / 52 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Platinum 8270
2019Why buy it
- ✅+2.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+123.4% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 26 cores / 52 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.5 vs 65.7 PassMark/$ ($7,405 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌632.1% higher power demand at 205W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 better than Xeon Platinum 8270?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 vs Xeon Platinum 8270 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,841 points. Launch price was $499.
Xeon Platinum 8270
The Xeon Platinum 8270 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 26 cores and 52 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,602 points. Launch price was $7,405.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8270 offers 26 cores / 52 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8270 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8270 — a 24.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 uses the Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8270 uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 scores 32,841 against the Xeon Platinum 8270's 33,602 — a 2.3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8270. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8270.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 | Xeon Platinum 8270 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 26 / 52+117% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+27% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.7 GHz+35% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 35.75 MB (total)+123% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025) | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) |
| PassMark | 32,841 | 33,602+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 32,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8270 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5X-8000 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8270 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 supports 172.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8270 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8270). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8270) — the Xeon Platinum 8270 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 | Xeon Platinum 8270 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5X-8000+173% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 1024 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8270). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the Xeon Platinum 8270 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 targets Mobile Workstation / AI, Xeon Platinum 8270 targets Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8270 rivals Xeon Platinum 8268.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 | Xeon Platinum 8270 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 890M | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Mobile Workstation / AI | Server / Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 was priced at $500, while the Xeon Platinum 8270 came in at $7405. On launch pricing ($500 vs $7405), Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 was $6905 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 delivers 65.7 pts/$ vs 4.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8270 — making the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 the 174.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 | Xeon Platinum 8270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-93% | $7405 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.7+1360% | 4.5 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 and Xeon Platinum 8270
