EPYC 7302
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7302
2019Why buy it
- ✅+2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.3 vs 65.7 PassMark/$ ($978 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌453.6% higher power demand at 155W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $478 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 91.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 65.7 vs 34.3 PassMark/$ ($500 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 155W, a 127W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (32,841 vs 33,499).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7302, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 better than EPYC 7302?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7302
The EPYC 7302 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,499 points. Launch price was $978.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,841 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7302 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7302 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 — a 42.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7302 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 uses Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7302 scores 33,499 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370's 32,841 — a 2% lead for the EPYC 7302. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7302 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370.
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 5.1 GHz+55% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+50% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025) |
| PassMark | 33,499+2% | 32,841 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,192 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,254 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7302 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7302 versus LPDDR5X-8000 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 supports 150% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7302 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 6300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7302) vs 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7302) vs 20 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370) — the EPYC 7302 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | LPDDR5X-8000+150% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+6300% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+540% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the EPYC 7302 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7302 targets Server / Multi-thread Workstation, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 targets Mobile Workstation / AI. Direct competitor: EPYC 7302 rivals Xeon Gold 6230.
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 890M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Server / Multi-thread Workstation | Mobile Workstation / AI |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7302 was priced at $978, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 came in at $500. On launch pricing ($978 vs $500), Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 was $478 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7302 delivers 34.3 pts/$ vs 65.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 — making the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 the 62.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $978 | $500-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.3 | 65.7+92% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7302 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
