
M4 Pro (12 cores)

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
M4 Pro (12 cores)
2024Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 28W, a 24W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
2025Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (32,841 vs 32,853).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $500 MSRP, while M4 Pro (12 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌600% higher power demand at 28W vs 4W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike M4 Pro (12 cores).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 better than M4 Pro (12 cores)?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
M4 Pro (12 cores)
The M4 Pro (12 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.592 GHz, with boost up to 4.51 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 32,853 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,841 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The M4 Pro (12 cores) packs 12 cores / 12 threads, matching the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370's 12 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.51 GHz on the M4 Pro (12 cores) versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 — a 12.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (base: 2.592 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is built on the Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 Pro (12 cores) scores 32,853 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370's 32,841 — a 0% lead for the M4 Pro (12 cores).
| Feature | M4 Pro (12 cores) | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 12 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.51 GHz | 5.1 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.592 GHz+30% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | — | Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025) |
| PassMark | 32,853 | 32,841 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,904 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,812 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,076 | — |
Memory & Platform
The M4 Pro (12 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5x-8000 memory speed. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370). PCIe lanes: 0 (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs 20 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370) — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | M4 Pro (12 cores) | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-8000 | LPDDR5X-8000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Apple Virtualization (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370). Both include integrated graphics — M4 Pro 16-core GPU (M4 Pro (12 cores)) and Radeon 890M (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M4 Pro (12 cores) targets High-end Content Creation, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 targets Mobile Workstation / AI. Direct competitor: M4 Pro (12 cores) rivals Ryzen 9 8945HS.
| Feature | M4 Pro (12 cores) | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | M4 Pro 16-core GPU | Radeon 890M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Apple Virtualization | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-end Content Creation | Mobile Workstation / AI |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













