EPYC 7302 vs M4 Pro (12 cores)

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7302

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

M4 Pro (12 cores)

12 Cores12 Thrd4 WWMax: 4.51 GHz2024

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7302 vs M4 Pro (12 cores) Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7302

16 / 32

33,499

+2.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

M4 Pro (12 cores)

12 / 12

32,853

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7302 vs M4 Pro (12 cores) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7302 vs M4 Pro (12 cores): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7302

2019

Why buy it

✅+3.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M4 Pro (12 cores) across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $978 MSRP, while M4 Pro (12 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3775% higher power demand at 155W vs 4W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while M4 Pro (12 cores) moves to none and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while M4 Pro (12 cores) can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

M4 Pro (12 cores)

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 4W instead of 155W, a 151W reduction.
✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with M4 Pro 16-core GPU, while EPYC 7302 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike EPYC 7302.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,904 vs 19,500).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7302, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is M4 Pro (12 cores) better than EPYC 7302?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7302 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while M4 Pro (12 cores) is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7302 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

M4 Pro (12 cores) is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7302 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. M4 Pro (12 cores) comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $978 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7302 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 3.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. EPYC 7302 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (34.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

M4 Pro (12 cores) makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with none and DDR5 instead of SP3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7302 vs M4 Pro (12 cores) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7302

The EPYC 7302 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,499 points. Launch price was $978.

M4 Pro (12 cores)

The M4 Pro (12 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.592 GHz, with boost up to 4.51 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 32,853 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7302 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the M4 Pro (12 cores) offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7302 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302 versus 4.51 GHz on the M4 Pro (12 cores) — a 31% clock advantage for the M4 Pro (12 cores) (base: 3 GHz vs 2.592 GHz). The EPYC 7302 is built on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7302 scores 33,499 against the M4 Pro (12 cores)'s 32,853 — a 1.9% lead for the EPYC 7302. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 18,904 (3.1% advantage for the EPYC 7302). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,192 vs 3,812, a 104.7% lead for the M4 Pro (12 cores) that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,254 vs 20,076 (64.8% advantage for the M4 Pro (12 cores)).

Feature	EPYC 7302	M4 Pro (12 cores)
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+33%	12 / 12
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	4.51 GHz+37%
Base Clock	3 GHz+16%	2.592 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	4 MB+700%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	3 nm-57%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	—
PassMark	33,499+2%	32,853
Cinebench R23 Multi	19,500+3%	18,904
Geekbench 6 Single	1,192	3,812+220%
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,254	20,076+96%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7302 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the M4 Pro (12 cores) uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7302 versus LPDDR5x-8000 on the M4 Pro (12 cores) — the M4 Pro (12 cores) supports 150% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7302 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 6300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7302) vs 1 (M4 Pro (12 cores)). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7302) vs 0 (M4 Pro (12 cores)) — the EPYC 7302 offers 128 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80,SP3 (EPYC 7302) and Apple SoC (M4 Pro (12 cores)).

Feature	EPYC 7302	M4 Pro (12 cores)
Socket	SP3	none
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	LPDDR5x-8000+150%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+6300%	64 GB
RAM Channels	8+700%	1
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	128	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302) vs Apple Virtualization (M4 Pro (12 cores)). The M4 Pro (12 cores) includes integrated graphics (M4 Pro 16-core GPU), while the EPYC 7302 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7302 targets Server / Multi-thread Workstation, M4 Pro (12 cores) targets High-end Content Creation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7302 rivals Xeon Gold 6230; M4 Pro (12 cores) rivals Ryzen 9 8945HS.

Feature	EPYC 7302	M4 Pro (12 cores)
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	M4 Pro 16-core GPU
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV	Apple Virtualization
Target Use	Server / Multi-thread Workstation	High-end Content Creation