M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M4 Pro (12 cores)

2024

Why buy it

✅+33.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 4W instead of 28W, a 24W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,904 vs 22,246).

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

2025

Why buy it

✅+17.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,864 vs 3,812).
❌600% higher power demand at 28W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 better than M4 Pro (12 cores)?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, M4 Pro (12 cores) is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 pulls ahead with 17.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is the stronger fit. You are getting 17.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 17.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 12/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M4 Pro (12 cores)

The M4 Pro (12 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.592 GHz, with boost up to 4.51 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 32,853 points. Launch price was $499.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,619 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The M4 Pro (12 cores) packs 12 cores / 12 threads, matching the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375's 12 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.51 GHz on the M4 Pro (12 cores) versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 — a 12.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (base: 2.592 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is built on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 Pro (12 cores) scores 32,853 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375's 33,619 — a 2.3% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,904 vs 22,246 (16.2% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,812 vs 2,864, a 28.4% lead for the M4 Pro (12 cores) that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,076 vs 15,012 (28.9% advantage for the M4 Pro (12 cores)).

Feature	M4 Pro (12 cores)	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Cores / Threads	12 / 12	12 / 24
Boost Clock	4.51 GHz	5.1 GHz+13%
Base Clock	2.592 GHz+30%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	16 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB (per core)
Process	3 nm-25%	4 nm
Architecture	—	Strix Point (2024−2025)
PassMark	32,853	33,619+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	18,904	22,246+18%
Geekbench 6 Single	3,812+33%	2,864
Geekbench 6 Multi	20,076+34%	15,012

🧠

Memory & Platform

The M4 Pro (12 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5x-8000 memory speed. The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). PCIe lanes: 0 (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple SoC (M4 Pro (12 cores)) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375).

Feature	M4 Pro (12 cores)	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Socket	none	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-8000	LPDDR5x-8000
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	256 GB+300%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Apple Virtualization (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). Both include integrated graphics — M4 Pro 16-core GPU (M4 Pro (12 cores)) and Radeon 890M (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M4 Pro (12 cores) targets High-end Content Creation, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 targets Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: M4 Pro (12 cores) rivals Ryzen 9 8945HS; Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 rivals Core i9-14900HX.

Feature	M4 Pro (12 cores)	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	M4 Pro 16-core GPU	Radeon 890M
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	Apple Virtualization	AMD-V, IOMMU
Target Use	High-end Content Creation	Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming