
M4 Pro (12 cores)

Ryzen 5 5600X
M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Ryzen 5 5600X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Ryzen 5 5600X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Ryzen 5 5600X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
M4 Pro (12 cores)
2024Why buy it
- ✅+50.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with M4 Pro 16-core GPU, while Ryzen 5 5600X needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 5 5600X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 32,853).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while M4 Pro (12 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while M4 Pro (12 cores) moves to none and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while M4 Pro (12 cores) can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is M4 Pro (12 cores) better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Ryzen 5 5600X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
M4 Pro (12 cores)
The M4 Pro (12 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.592 GHz, with boost up to 4.51 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 32,853 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The M4 Pro (12 cores) packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the M4 Pro (12 cores) has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.51 GHz on the M4 Pro (12 cores) versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 2.592 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X is built on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 Pro (12 cores) scores 32,853 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 40.3% lead for the M4 Pro (12 cores).
| Feature | M4 Pro (12 cores) | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 12+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.51 GHz | 4.6 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.592 GHz | 3.7 GHz+43% |
| L3 Cache | — | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 512K (per core)+12700% |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | — | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 32,853+50% | 21,845 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,904 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,812 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,076 | — |
Memory & Platform
The M4 Pro (12 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8000 on the M4 Pro (12 cores) versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X — the M4 Pro (12 cores) supports 150% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 5600X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 5600X). PCIe lanes: 0 (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) — the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple SoC (M4 Pro (12 cores)) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X).
| Feature | M4 Pro (12 cores) | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-8000+150% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: Apple Virtualization (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). The M4 Pro (12 cores) includes integrated graphics (M4 Pro 16-core GPU), while the Ryzen 5 5600X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M4 Pro (12 cores) targets High-end Content Creation, Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: M4 Pro (12 cores) rivals Ryzen 9 8945HS.
| Feature | M4 Pro (12 cores) | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | M4 Pro 16-core GPU | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Apple Virtualization | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-end Content Creation | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













