M4 Pro (12 cores)
VS
Xeon w3-2535

M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Xeon w3-2535

M4 Pro (12 cores)

12 Cores12 Thrd4 WWMax: 4.51 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Xeon w3-2535

10 Cores20 Thrd185 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar M4 Pro (12 cores)

#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
108%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
107%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
106%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
103%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
101%
#171
M4 Pro (12 cores)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
98%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
95%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
94%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
94%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
90%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon w3-2535

#222
Xeon E-2478
MSRP: $568|Avg: $269
108%
#223
Xeon W-1390
MSRP: $494|Avg: $400
107%
#225
Xeon W-1250
MSRP: $285|Avg: $333
106%
#226
EPYC 9135
MSRP: $1214|Avg: $95
105%
#227
Xeon E-2378
MSRP: $362|Avg: $562
104%
#228
Xeon w3-2525
MSRP: $609|Avg: $800
104%
#230
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $368
103%
#232
EPYC 7282
MSRP: $650|Avg: $199
103%
#233
Xeon w5-2545
MSRP: $889|Avg: $1100
102%
#234
Xeon W-1250P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
102%
#237
Xeon w3-2535
MSRP: $739|Avg: $800
100%
#239
EPYC 7313P
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
100%
#240
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $60
99%
#241
Xeon w5-2555X
MSRP: $1069|Avg: $1145
99%
#242
Xeon E-2246G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $268
99%
#244
Xeon w3-2423
MSRP: $359|Avg: $300
97%
#245
EPYC 8434P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $3137
97%
#247
EPYC 7443P
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $1045
94%
#248
EPYC 4564P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
94%
#249
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
MSRP: $1340|Avg: $1340
94%
#250
EPYC 7D12
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
94%
#251
Xeon W-1390P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $450
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($800) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon w3-2535 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightM4 Pro (12 cores)Xeon w3-2535
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($800)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The M4 Pro (12 cores) ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($800 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightM4 Pro (12 cores)Xeon w3-2535
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($800)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon w3-2535

M4 Pro (12 cores)

The M4 Pro (12 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.592 GHz, with boost up to 4.51 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 32,853 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel

Xeon w3-2535

The Xeon w3-2535 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 33,367 points. Launch price was $739.

Processing Power

The M4 Pro (12 cores) packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon w3-2535 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the M4 Pro (12 cores) has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.51 GHz on the M4 Pro (12 cores) versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon w3-2535 — a 2% clock advantage for the Xeon w3-2535 (base: 2.592 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon w3-2535 is built on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 Pro (12 cores) scores 32,853 against the Xeon w3-2535's 33,367 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon w3-2535. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,904 vs 17,500 (7.7% advantage for the M4 Pro (12 cores)). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,812 vs 2,254, a 51.4% lead for the M4 Pro (12 cores) that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,076 vs 12,400 (47.3% advantage for the M4 Pro (12 cores)).

FeatureM4 Pro (12 cores)Xeon w3-2535
Cores / Threads
12 / 12+20%
10 / 20
Boost Clock
4.51 GHz
4.6 GHz+2%
Base Clock
2.592 GHz
3.5 GHz+35%
L3 Cache
26.25 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm-57%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
32,853
33,367+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi
18,904+8%
17,500
Geekbench 6 Single
3,812+69%
2,254
Geekbench 6 Multi
20,076+62%
12,400
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M4 Pro (12 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w3-2535 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5x-8000 memory speed. The Xeon w3-2535 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs 4 (Xeon w3-2535). PCIe lanes: 0 (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs 64 (Xeon w3-2535) — the Xeon w3-2535 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple SoC (M4 Pro (12 cores)) and W790 (Xeon w3-2535).

FeatureM4 Pro (12 cores)Xeon w3-2535
Socket
none
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x-8000
DDR5-4400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
2048 GB+3100%
RAM Channels
1
4+300%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
64
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon w3-2535 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Apple Virtualization (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon w3-2535). The M4 Pro (12 cores) includes integrated graphics (M4 Pro 16-core GPU), while the Xeon w3-2535 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M4 Pro (12 cores) targets High-end Content Creation, Xeon w3-2535 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: M4 Pro (12 cores) rivals Ryzen 9 8945HS; Xeon w3-2535 rivals EPYC 7313.

FeatureM4 Pro (12 cores)Xeon w3-2535
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
M4 Pro 16-core GPU
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
Apple Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High-end Content Creation
Workstation