M4 Pro (12 cores) vs EPYC 7302P
M4 Pro (12 cores)
EPYC 7302P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar M4 Pro (12 cores)
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7302P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | M4 Pro (12 cores) | EPYC 7302P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | M4 Pro (12 cores) | EPYC 7302P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M4 Pro (12 cores) and EPYC 7302P
M4 Pro (12 cores)
The M4 Pro (12 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.592 GHz, with boost up to 4.51 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 32,853 points. Launch price was $499.
EPYC 7302P
The EPYC 7302P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 32,690 points. Launch price was $825.
Processing Power
The M4 Pro (12 cores) packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the EPYC 7302P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7302P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.51 GHz on the M4 Pro (12 cores) versus 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302P — a 31% clock advantage for the M4 Pro (12 cores) (base: 2.592 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 7302P is built on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 Pro (12 cores) scores 32,853 against the EPYC 7302P's 32,690 — a 0.5% lead for the M4 Pro (12 cores). Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,904 vs 11,500 (48.7% advantage for the M4 Pro (12 cores)). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,812 vs 1,320, a 97.1% lead for the M4 Pro (12 cores) that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,076 vs 11,450 (54.7% advantage for the M4 Pro (12 cores)).
| Feature | M4 Pro (12 cores) | EPYC 7302P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 12 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.51 GHz+37% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.592 GHz | 3 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | — | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | — | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 32,853 | 32,690 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,904+64% | 11,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,812+189% | 1,320 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,076+75% | 11,450 |
Memory & Platform
The M4 Pro (12 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7302P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8000 on the M4 Pro (12 cores) versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7302P — the M4 Pro (12 cores) supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7302P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 193.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs 8 (EPYC 7302P). PCIe lanes: 0 (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs 128 (EPYC 7302P) — the EPYC 7302P offers 128 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple SoC (M4 Pro (12 cores)) and SP3 (EPYC 7302P).
| Feature | M4 Pro (12 cores) | EPYC 7302P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-8000+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 4096 GB+6300% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 8+700% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: Apple Virtualization (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302P). The M4 Pro (12 cores) includes integrated graphics (M4 Pro 16-core GPU), while the EPYC 7302P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M4 Pro (12 cores) targets High-end Content Creation, EPYC 7302P targets Server / Virtualization. Direct competitor: M4 Pro (12 cores) rivals Ryzen 9 8945HS; EPYC 7302P rivals Xeon Gold 6230.
| Feature | M4 Pro (12 cores) | EPYC 7302P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | M4 Pro 16-core GPU | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Apple Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV |
| Target Use | High-end Content Creation | Server / Virtualization |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on M4 Pro (12 cores) and EPYC 7302P
