Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs Xeon E-2104G

Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs Xeon E-2104G Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Embedded R2314

4 / 4

5,850

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E-2104G

4 / 4

5,858

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs Xeon E-2104G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs Xeon E-2104G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Embedded R2314

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,850 vs 5,858).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.5 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).

Xeon E-2104G

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Costs $107 less on MSRP ($193 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 55.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.4 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded R2314 better than Xeon E-2104G?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2104G makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Embedded R2314 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2104G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded R2314 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E-2104G is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen Embedded R2314 comes in 55.4% more expensive on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $193 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E-2104G is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. Xeon E-2104G is also 55.7% better value on MSRP (30.4 vs 19.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R2314 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs Xeon E-2104G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Embedded R2314

The Ryzen Embedded R2314 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 June 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,850 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E-2104G

The Xeon E-2104G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 5,858 points. Launch price was $193.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Xeon E-2104G share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2314 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E-2104G — a 9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R2314 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded R2314 uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E-2104G uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded R2314 scores 5,850 against the Xeon E-2104G's 5,858 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E-2104G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2104G.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded R2314	Xeon E-2104G
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+9%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+52%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	12 nm-14%	14 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)
PassMark	5,850	5,858

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded R2314 uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E-2104G uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded R2314	Xeon E-2104G
Socket	FP5	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Embedded R2314 was priced at $300, while the Xeon E-2104G came in at $193. On launch pricing ($300 vs $193), Xeon E-2104G was $107 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Embedded R2314 delivers 19.5 pts/$ vs 30.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E-2104G — making the Xeon E-2104G the 43.5% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded R2314	Xeon E-2104G
MSRP	$300	$193-36%
Performance per Dollar	19.5	30.4+56%
Release Date	2022	2018

Search Ryzen Embedded R2314 on Amazon

Search Xeon E-2104G on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.