Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs Xeon E3-1505L v6

Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs Xeon E3-1505L v6 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Embedded R2314

4 / 4

5,850

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1505L v6

4 / 8

5,882

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs Xeon E3-1505L v6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs Xeon E3-1505L v6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Embedded R2314

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1505L v6 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,850 vs 5,882).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1505L v6, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1505L v6 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E3-1505L v6

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1505L v6 better than Ryzen Embedded R2314?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1505L v6 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Embedded R2314 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1505L v6 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1505L v6 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1505L v6 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon E3-1505L v6 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Embedded R2314 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 14.6% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R2314 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs Xeon E3-1505L v6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Embedded R2314

The Ryzen Embedded R2314 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 June 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,850 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1505L v6

The Xeon E3-1505L v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,882 points. Launch price was $433.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Embedded R2314 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1505L v6's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2314 versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E3-1505L v6 — a 45.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R2314. The Ryzen Embedded R2314 uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E3-1505L v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded R2314 scores 5,850 against the Xeon E3-1505L v6's 5,882 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E3-1505L v6. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1505L v6.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded R2314	Xeon E3-1505L v6
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+59%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB+100%
Process	12 nm-14%	14 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	5,850	5,882