
Ryzen Embedded R2314

Xeon E3-1515M v5
Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs Xeon E3-1515M v5 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs Xeon E3-1515M v5 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs Xeon E3-1515M v5: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Embedded R2314
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1515M v5 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,850 vs 5,925).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1515M v5, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 16 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1515M v5 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E3-1515M v5
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 16 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Pro Graphics P580, while Ryzen Embedded R2314 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E3-1515M v5 better than Ryzen Embedded R2314?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs Xeon E3-1515M v5 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen Embedded R2314
The Ryzen Embedded R2314 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 June 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,850 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1515M v5
The Xeon E3-1515M v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-H (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,925 points. Launch price was $489.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Embedded R2314 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1515M v5's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2314 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1515M v5 — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1515M v5 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded R2314 uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E3-1515M v5 uses Skylake-H (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded R2314 scores 5,850 against the Xeon E3-1515M v5's 5,925 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E3-1515M v5. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1515M v5.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded R2314 | Xeon E3-1515M v5 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.8 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019−2022) | Skylake-H (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 5,850 | 5,925+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,017 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Embedded R2314 uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1515M v5 uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded R2314 | Xeon E3-1515M v5 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Embedded R2314) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E3-1515M v5). The Xeon E3-1515M v5 includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics P580), while the Ryzen Embedded R2314 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1515M v5 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Xeon E3-1515M v5 rivals Core i7-6700HQ.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded R2314 | Xeon E3-1515M v5 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Productivity |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














