Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs Xeon E5-2623 v3

Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs Xeon E5-2623 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Embedded R2514

4 / 8

6,731

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-2623 v3

4 / 8

6,652

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs Xeon E5-2623 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs Xeon E5-2623 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Embedded R2514

2022

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2623 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2623 v3, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2623 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,652 vs 6,731).
❌Launch MSRP is still $444 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded R2514 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded R2514 better than Xeon E5-2623 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2623 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Embedded R2514 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R2514 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded R2514 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2623 v3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen Embedded R2514 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $444 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2623 v3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2623 v3 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (15.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R2514 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs Xeon E5-2623 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Embedded R2514

The Ryzen Embedded R2514 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,731 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2623 v3

The Xeon E5-2623 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 6,652 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen Embedded R2514 and Xeon E5-2623 v3 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2514 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2623 v3 — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R2514 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded R2514 uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2623 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded R2514 scores 6,731 against the Xeon E5-2623 v3's 6,652 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R2514. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2623 v3.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded R2514	Xeon E5-2623 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+6%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3 GHz+43%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	10 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	12 nm-45%	22 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	6,731+1%	6,652
Geekbench 6 Single	—	899
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	3,683

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded R2514 uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2623 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.