Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Xeon E5-2640 v3

Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Xeon E5-2640 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Embedded V2546

6 / 12

10,912

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2640 v3

8 / 16

11,055

+1.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Xeon E5-2640 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Xeon E5-2640 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Embedded V2546

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $639 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $939 MSRP).
✅Delivers 209.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.4 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $939 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 90W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2640 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (10,912 vs 11,055).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2640 v3, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2640 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 36.4 PassMark/$ ($939 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 90W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2640 v3 better than Ryzen Embedded V2546?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2640 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Embedded V2546 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2640 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2640 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2640 v3 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon E5-2640 v3 comes in 213.0% more expensive on MSRP at $939 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Embedded V2546 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 4.9% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V2546 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Xeon E5-2640 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Embedded V2546

The Ryzen Embedded V2546 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.95 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,912 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2640 v3

The Xeon E5-2640 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 11,055 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Embedded V2546 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2640 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.95 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2546 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2640 v3 — a 15% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V2546 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V2546 uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V2546 scores 10,912 against the Xeon E5-2640 v3's 11,055 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2640 v3. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2640 v3.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2546	Xeon E5-2640 v3
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	3.95 GHz+16%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+15%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Renoir (2020−2023)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	10,912	11,055+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded V2546 uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2546	Xeon E5-2640 v3
Socket	FP6	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity	—	768 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Embedded V2546) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2640 v3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2640 v3 targets Server.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2546	Xeon E5-2640 v3
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Embedded V2546 was priced at $300, while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 came in at $939. On launch pricing ($300 vs $939), Ryzen Embedded V2546 was $639 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Embedded V2546 delivers 36.4 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2640 v3 — making the Ryzen Embedded V2546 the 102.2% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2546	Xeon E5-2640 v3
MSRP	$300-68%	$939
Performance per Dollar	36.4+208%	11.8
Release Date	2020	2014

Search Ryzen Embedded V2546 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2640 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.