Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Xeon E5-2640 v3
Ryzen Embedded V2546
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Embedded V2546
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2640 v3
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Embedded V2546 | Xeon E5-2640 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($300) | ✅ More affordable ($189) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Renoir (2020−2023) / 7 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Embedded V2546 | Xeon E5-2640 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+61%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($300) | ✅ More affordable ($189) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Embedded V2546 and Xeon E5-2640 v3
Ryzen Embedded V2546
The Ryzen Embedded V2546 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.95 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,912 points. Launch price was $149.
Xeon E5-2640 v3
The Xeon E5-2640 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 11,055 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Embedded V2546 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2640 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.95 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2546 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2640 v3 — a 15% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V2546 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V2546 uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V2546 scores 10,912 against the Xeon E5-2640 v3's 11,055 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2640 v3. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2640 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V2546 | Xeon E5-2640 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.95 GHz+16% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+15% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir (2020−2023) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 10,912 | 11,055+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Embedded V2546 uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V2546 | Xeon E5-2640 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Embedded V2546) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2640 v3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2640 v3 targets Server.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V2546 | Xeon E5-2640 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Embedded V2546 launched at $300 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 debuted at $939. At current prices ($300 vs $189), the Xeon E5-2640 v3 is $111 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Embedded V2546 delivers 36.4 pts/$ vs 58.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2640 v3 — making the Xeon E5-2640 v3 the 46.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V2546 | Xeon E5-2640 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-68% | $939 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $189-37% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.4 | 58.5+61% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Embedded V2546 and Xeon E5-2640 v3
