
Ryzen Embedded V2546

Xeon E5-4650 v2
Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Xeon E5-4650 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Xeon E5-4650 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Xeon E5-4650 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Embedded V2546
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,423 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,723 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 472.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.4 vs 6.4 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,723 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4650 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,912 vs 10,946).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4650 v2, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
Xeon E5-4650 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 36.4 PassMark/$ ($1,723 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-4650 v2 better than Ryzen Embedded V2546?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Xeon E5-4650 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen Embedded V2546
The Ryzen Embedded V2546 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.95 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,912 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-4650 v2
The Xeon E5-4650 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 10,946 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Embedded V2546 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4650 v2 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-4650 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.95 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2546 versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-4650 v2 — a 30.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V2546 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V2546 is built on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V2546 scores 10,912 against the Xeon E5-4650 v2's 10,946 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-4650 v2. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs 25 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon E5-4650 v2.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V2546 | Xeon E5-4650 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 3.95 GHz+36% | 2.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+25% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 25 MB Intel® Smart Cache+213% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir (2020−2023) | — |
| PassMark | 10,912 | 10,946 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Embedded V2546 uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4650 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V2546 | Xeon E5-4650 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Embedded V2546 was priced at $300, while the Xeon E5-4650 v2 came in at $1723. On launch pricing ($300 vs $1723), Ryzen Embedded V2546 was $1423 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Embedded V2546 delivers 36.4 pts/$ vs 6.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4650 v2 — making the Ryzen Embedded V2546 the 140.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V2546 | Xeon E5-4650 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-83% | $1723 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.4+469% | 6.4 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













