Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Xeon E5-2643 v4

Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Xeon E5-2643 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Embedded V2546

6 / 12

10,912

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2643 v4

6 / 12

11,024

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Xeon E5-2643 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Xeon E5-2643 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Embedded V2546

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,252 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
✅Delivers 412.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.4 vs 7.1 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 135W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,912 vs 11,024).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).

Xeon E5-2643 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 36.4 PassMark/$ ($1,552 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 135W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded V2546 better than Xeon E5-2643 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2643 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Embedded V2546 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2643 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded V2546 is the better buy right now. Ryzen Embedded V2546 comes in $1,252 cheaper on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $1,552 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2643 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1% better PassMark. It is also 412.1% better value on MSRP (36.4 vs 7.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V2546 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Xeon E5-2643 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Embedded V2546

The Ryzen Embedded V2546 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.95 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,912 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2643 v4

The Xeon E5-2643 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 11,024 points. Launch price was $1,552.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen Embedded V2546 and Xeon E5-2643 v4 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.95 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2546 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2643 v4 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V2546 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V2546 uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2643 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V2546 scores 10,912 against the Xeon E5-2643 v4's 11,024 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-2643 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2643 v4.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2546	Xeon E5-2643 v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.95 GHz+7%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.4 GHz+13%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	20 MB+150%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+34033%	1.5 MB
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Renoir (2020−2023)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	10,912	11,024+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded V2546 uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2643 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2546	Xeon E5-2643 v4
Socket	FP6	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Embedded V2546 was priced at $300, while the Xeon E5-2643 v4 came in at $1552. On launch pricing ($300 vs $1552), Ryzen Embedded V2546 was $1252 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Embedded V2546 delivers 36.4 pts/$ vs 7.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2643 v4 — making the Ryzen Embedded V2546 the 134.6% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2546	Xeon E5-2643 v4
MSRP	$300-81%	$1552
Performance per Dollar	36.4+413%	7.1
Release Date	2020	2016

Search Ryzen Embedded V2546 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2643 v4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.