Core 7 160UL vs Ryzen Embedded V2546

Core 7 160UL vs Ryzen Embedded V2546 Performance Spectrum

Core 7 160UL

10 / 12

11,043

+1.2%

10,912

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 7 160UL vs Ryzen Embedded V2546 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 7 160UL vs Ryzen Embedded V2546: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 7 160UL

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen Embedded V2546

2020

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 160UL across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (10,912 vs 11,043).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Core 7 160UL mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 7 160UL better than Ryzen Embedded V2546?

Yes. Core 7 160UL is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 13.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 7 160UL is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 7 160UL is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 7 160UL is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core 7 160UL comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Embedded V2546 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 13.6% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 7 160UL makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FP6, 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core 7 160UL vs Ryzen Embedded V2546 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 7 160UL

The Core 7 160UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,043 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen Embedded V2546

The Ryzen Embedded V2546 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.95 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,912 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 7 160UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V2546 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core 7 160UL has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 160UL versus 3.95 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2546 — a 27.3% clock advantage for the Core 7 160UL (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core 7 160UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V2546 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 160UL scores 11,043 against the Ryzen Embedded V2546's 10,912 — a 1.2% lead for the Core 7 160UL. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 7 160UL vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2546.

Feature	Core 7 160UL	Ryzen Embedded V2546
Cores / Threads	10 / 12+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+32%	3.95 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	3 GHz+67%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+40860%
Process	10 nm	7 nm-30%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-PS (2024)	Renoir (2020−2023)
PassMark	11,043+1%	10,912

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 7 160UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V2546 uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.