Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Xeon E5-4650 v3

Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Xeon E5-4650 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Embedded V2546

6 / 12

10,912

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-4650 v3

12 / 24

10,838

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Xeon E5-4650 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Xeon E5-4650 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Embedded V2546

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 105W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4650 v3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4650 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-4650 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,838 vs 10,912).
❌133.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded V2546 better than Xeon E5-4650 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4650 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Embedded V2546 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Embedded V2546 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded V2546 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded V2546 is the better buy right now. Ryzen Embedded V2546 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $300 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (36.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V2546 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Xeon E5-4650 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Embedded V2546

The Ryzen Embedded V2546 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.95 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,912 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-4650 v3

The Xeon E5-4650 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,838 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Embedded V2546 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4650 v3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-4650 v3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.95 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2546 versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4650 v3 — a 34.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V2546 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V2546 uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4650 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V2546 scores 10,912 against the Xeon E5-4650 v3's 10,838 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V2546. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4650 v3.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2546	Xeon E5-4650 v3
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	12 / 24+100%
Boost Clock	3.95 GHz+41%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+43%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+275%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Renoir (2020−2023)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	10,912	10,838

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded V2546 uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4650 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.