Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs Xeon E3-1265L v2

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs Xeon E3-1265L v2 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Embedded V2A46

6 / 12

4,999

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1265L v2

4 / 8

5,040

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs Xeon E3-1265L v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs Xeon E3-1265L v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,999 vs 5,040).

Xeon E3-1265L v2

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V2A46 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $265 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded V2A46 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded V2A46 better than Xeon E3-1265L v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1265L v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1265L v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E3-1265L v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen Embedded V2A46 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $265 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1265L v2 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. Xeon E3-1265L v2 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs Xeon E3-1265L v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46

The Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,999 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E3-1265L v2

The Xeon E3-1265L v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,040 points. Launch price was $142.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Embedded V2A46 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E3-1265L v2 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1265L v2 — a 9% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1265L v2 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V2A46 uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E3-1265L v2 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 scores 4,999 against the Xeon E3-1265L v2's 5,040 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E3-1265L v2. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2A46	Xeon E3-1265L v2
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.5 GHz+9%
Base Clock	3 GHz+20%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Renoir (2020−2023)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	4,999	5,040

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded V2A46 uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1265L v2 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2A46	Xeon E3-1265L v2
Socket	FP6	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 was priced at $0, while the Xeon E3-1265L v2 came in at $265. On launch pricing ($0 vs $265), Ryzen Embedded V2A46 was $265 cheaper.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2A46	Xeon E3-1265L v2
MSRP	$0-100%	$265
Performance per Dollar	—	19.0
Release Date	2023	2012

Search Ryzen Embedded V2A46 on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1265L v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.