Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs Xeon E5645

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs Xeon E5645 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Embedded V2A46

6 / 12

4,999

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5645

6 / 12

4,942

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs Xeon E5645 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs Xeon E5645: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).

Xeon E5645

2010

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,942 vs 4,999).
❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded V2A46 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded V2A46 better than Xeon E5645?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5645 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5645 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen Embedded V2A46 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5645 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs Xeon E5645 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46

The Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,999 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E5645

The Xeon E5645 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,942 points. Launch price was $294.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 and Xeon E5645 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 versus 2.67 GHz on the Xeon E5645 — a 18.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V2A46 uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5645 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 scores 4,999 against the Xeon E5645's 4,942 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V2A46. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E5645.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2A46	Xeon E5645
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+20%	2.67 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+25%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm-78%	32 nm
Architecture	Renoir (2020−2023)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	4,999+1%	4,942

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded V2A46 uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5645 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2A46	Xeon E5645
Socket	FP6	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	—	288 GB
RAM Channels	—	3
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Embedded V2A46) / VT-x (Xeon E5645). Primary use case: Xeon E5645 targets Server.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2A46	Xeon E5645
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 was priced at $0, while the Xeon E5645 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($0 vs $294), Ryzen Embedded V2A46 was $294 cheaper.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2A46	Xeon E5645
MSRP	$0-100%	$294
Performance per Dollar	—	16.8
Release Date	2023	2010

Search Ryzen Embedded V2A46 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5645 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.