Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs Xeon E5-2420

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs Xeon E5-2420 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Embedded V2A46

6 / 12

4,999

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-2420

6 / 12

5,012

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs Xeon E5-2420 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs Xeon E5-2420: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,999 vs 5,012).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).

Xeon E5-2420

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V2A46 across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded V2A46 better than Xeon E5-2420?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2420 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2420 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen Embedded V2A46 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.7% average FPS lead across 42 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs Xeon E5-2420 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46

The Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,999 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E5-2420

The Xeon E5-2420 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,012 points. Launch price was $390.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 and Xeon E5-2420 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2420 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 (base: 3 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V2A46 uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2420 uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 scores 4,999 against the Xeon E5-2420's 5,012 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2420. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2420.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2A46	Xeon E5-2420
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+33%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+58%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	15360 kB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm-78%	32 nm
Architecture	Renoir (2020−2023)	Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
PassMark	4,999	5,012

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded V2A46 uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2420 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.