Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs Xeon E5-1607 v3

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs Xeon E5-1607 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Embedded V2A46

6 / 12

4,999

+1.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-1607 v3

4 / 4

4,932

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs Xeon E5-1607 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs Xeon E5-1607 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).

Xeon E5-1607 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V2A46 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,932 vs 4,999).
❌300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded V2A46 better than Xeon E5-1607 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1607 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen Embedded V2A46 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs Xeon E5-1607 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46

The Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,999 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E5-1607 v3

The Xeon E5-1607 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 4,932 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Embedded V2A46 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-1607 v3 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-1607 v3 — a 3.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V2A46 uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-1607 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 scores 4,999 against the Xeon E5-1607 v3's 4,932 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V2A46. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1607 v3.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V2A46	Xeon E5-1607 v3
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+3%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.1 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	10 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Renoir (2020−2023)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	4,999+1%	4,932

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded V2A46 uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1607 v3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.