Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($116) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen+ (2018−2019) / 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+28%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($116) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,829 points. Launch price was $549.
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,959 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X scores 16,829 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X's 16,959 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.1 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+6% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 16,829 | 16,959 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,255 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 6,243 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3r2 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1900X) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X targets Workstation.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X debuted at $329. At current prices ($116 vs $150), the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is $34 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X delivers 145.1 pts/$ vs 113.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X the 24.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | $329-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $116-23% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 145.1+28% | 113.1 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
