Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon D-1848TER

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon D-1848TER Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

8 / 16

16,829

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon D-1848TER

10 / 20

16,952

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon D-1848TER FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon D-1848TER: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,829 vs 16,952).
❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Xeon D-1848TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌215.8% higher power demand at 180W vs 57W.

Xeon D-1848TER

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 57W instead of 180W, a 123W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1848TER better than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is ahead with a 28.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1848TER pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Ryzen Threadripper 1900X also has the bigger cache pool with 113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1848TER is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1848TER is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon D-1848TER comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $549 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 28.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (30.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1848TER makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon D-1848TER Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,829 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon D-1848TER

The Xeon D-1848TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 57 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,952 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-1848TER offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon D-1848TER has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1848TER — a 25.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is built on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X scores 16,829 against the Xeon D-1848TER's 16,952 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon D-1848TER. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs 15360 kB on the Xeon D-1848TER.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 1900X	Xeon D-1848TER
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+29%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+90%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB+113%	15360 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	—
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	—
PassMark	16,829	16,952

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1848TER uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.