
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
2018Why buy it
- β +0.8% higher PassMark.
- β Costs $220 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- β Delivers 68.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.5 vs 30.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- β Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βSmaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (16,829 vs 16,959).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 30.7 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X better than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018β2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,959 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,829 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X β a 2.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses the Zen+ (2018β2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses Zen (2017β2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X scores 16,959 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X's 16,829 β a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+2% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018β2019) | Zen (2017β2020) |
| PassMark | 16,959 | 16,829 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,255 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,243 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | Yes | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1900X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X targets Workstation.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | β |
| Target Use | Workstation | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X was priced at $329, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($329 vs $549), Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X was $220 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X delivers 51.5 pts/$ vs 30.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X β making the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X the 50.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-40% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.5+68% | 30.7 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













