Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

8 Cores16 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2018
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

8 Cores16 Thrd180 WWMax: 4 GHz2017
Threadripper family
Β·Β·Β·

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

2018

Why buy it

  • βœ…+0.8% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…Costs $220 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 68.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.5 vs 30.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
  • βœ…100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

2017

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (16,829 vs 16,959).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.7 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X better than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper 1900X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X comes in $220 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $549 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 68.2% better value on MSRP (51.5 vs 30.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,959 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017βˆ’2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,829 points. Launch price was $549.

⚑

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X β€” a 2.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses the Zen+ (2018βˆ’2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses Zen (2017βˆ’2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X scores 16,959 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X's 16,829 β€” a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.

FeatureRyzen 7 PRO 2700XRyzen Threadripper 1900X
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz+2%
4 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz+6%
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
32 MB+100%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
12 nm-14%
14 nm
Architecture
Zen+ (2018βˆ’2019)
Zen (2017βˆ’2020)
PassMark
16,959
16,829
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,500
β€”
Geekbench 6 Single
1,255
β€”
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,243
β€”
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 PRO 2700XRyzen Threadripper 1900X
Socket
AM4
SP3r2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
β€”
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
β€”
RAM Channels
2
β€”
ECC Support
Yes
β€”
PCIe Lanes
20
β€”
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1900X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X targets Workstation.

FeatureRyzen 7 PRO 2700XRyzen Threadripper 1900X
Integrated GPU
No
β€”
Unlocked
Yes
β€”
AVX-512
No
β€”
Virtualization
AMD-V
β€”
Target Use
Workstation
β€”
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X was priced at $329, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($329 vs $549), Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X was $220 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X delivers 51.5 pts/$ vs 30.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X β€” making the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X the 50.8% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 7 PRO 2700XRyzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP
$329-40%
$549
Performance per Dollar
51.5+68%
30.7
Release Date
2018
2017

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.