Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon W-3223

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon W-3223 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

8 / 16

16,829

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-3223

8 / 16

16,956

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon W-3223 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon W-3223: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,829 vs 16,956).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.7 vs 57.7 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).

Xeon W-3223

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $255 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Delivers 88.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.7 vs 30.7 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Draws 160W instead of 180W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3223 better than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is ahead with a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3223 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Ryzen Threadripper 1900X also has the bigger cache pool with 93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3223 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3223 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-3223 comes in $255 cheaper on MSRP at $294 MSRP versus $549 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 88.1% better value on MSRP (57.7 vs 30.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3223 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon W-3223 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,829 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon W-3223

The Xeon W-3223 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,956 points. Launch price was $749.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon W-3223 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon W-3223 — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3223 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-3223 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X scores 16,829 against the Xeon W-3223's 16,956 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon W-3223. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-3223.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 1900X	Xeon W-3223
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4.2 GHz+5%
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+9%	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB+94%	16.5 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+6300%	8 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	16,829	16,956

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3223 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 1900X	Xeon W-3223
Socket	SP3r2	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X was priced at $549, while the Xeon W-3223 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($549 vs $294), Xeon W-3223 was $255 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X delivers 30.7 pts/$ vs 57.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3223 — making the Xeon W-3223 the 61.2% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 1900X	Xeon W-3223
MSRP	$549	$294-46%
Performance per Dollar	30.7	57.7+88%
Release Date	2017	2019

Search Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3223 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.