Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Core i9-10900KF
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Core i9-10900KF
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Performance Per Dollar Core i9-10900KF
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($200) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($336) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+67%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($200) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($336) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i9-10900KF
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.
Core i9-10900KF
The Core i9-10900KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 22,231 points. Launch price was $509.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Core i9-10900KF offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-10900KF — a 31.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900KF (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-10900KF uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 scores 22,066 against the Core i9-10900KF's 22,231 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i9-10900KF. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900KF.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+20% | 10 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 5.2 GHz+37% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+60% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 22,066 | 22,231 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,767 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,261 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-10900KF uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3r2 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1920) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900KF).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 launched at $799 MSRP, while the Core i9-10900KF debuted at $509. At current prices ($200 vs $336), the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is $136 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 delivers 110.3 pts/$ vs 66.2 pts/$ for the Core i9-10900KF — making the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 the 50% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $509-36% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-40% | $336 |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.3+67% | 66.2 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i9-10900KF
