
Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
2017Why buy it
- β Costs $200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- β Delivers 25.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.6 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- β Draws 140W instead of 180W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (22,066 vs 22,077).
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
2017Why buy it
- β +0% higher PassMark.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 22.1 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- β28.6% higher power demand at 180W vs 140W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 1920 better than Ryzen Threadripper 1950?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen Threadripper 1920
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017β2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Threadripper 1950
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017β2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,077 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 offers 16 cores / 32 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 versus 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 β a 17.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). Both are built on the Zen (2017β2020) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 scores 22,066 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1950's 22,077 β a 0% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950. Both processors carry 32 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+19% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017β2020) | Zen (2017β2020) |
| PassMark | 22,066 | 22,077 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 18,780 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,961 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 10,100 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP3r2 socket with PCIe 4.0.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3r2 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 4 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 64 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1920) / AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 1950). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 1950 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 1950 rivals Core i9-7960X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | No |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 was priced at $799, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 came in at $999. On launch pricing ($799 vs $999), Ryzen Threadripper 1920 was $200 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 delivers 27.6 pts/$ vs 22.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 β making the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 the 22.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-20% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.6+25% | 22.1 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














