Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

12 Cores24 Thrd140 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017
Threadripper family
Β·Β·
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

16 Cores32 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2017
Threadripper family
Β·Β·

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 25.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.6 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 140W instead of 180W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (22,066 vs 22,077).

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

2017

Why buy it

  • βœ…+0% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.1 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • ❌28.6% higher power demand at 180W vs 140W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 1920 better than Ryzen Threadripper 1950?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is ahead with a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1950 pulls ahead with 0% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 comes in $200 cheaper on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0% better PassMark. It is also 25.0% better value on MSRP (27.6 vs 22.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017βˆ’2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017βˆ’2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,077 points. Launch price was $299.

⚑

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 offers 16 cores / 32 threads β€” the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 versus 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 β€” a 17.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). Both are built on the Zen (2017βˆ’2020) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 scores 22,066 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1950's 22,077 β€” a 0% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950. Both processors carry 32 MB of L3 cache.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 1920Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Cores / Threads
12 / 24
16 / 32+33%
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+19%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB
32 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Zen (2017βˆ’2020)
Zen (2017βˆ’2020)
PassMark
22,066
22,077
Cinebench R23 Multi
β€”
18,780
Geekbench 6 Single
β€”
1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi
β€”
10,100
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP3r2 socket with PCIe 4.0.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 1920Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Socket
SP3r2
SP3r2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
β€”
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
β€”
128 GB
RAM Channels
β€”
4
ECC Support
β€”
Yes
PCIe Lanes
β€”
64
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1920) / AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 1950). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 1950 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 1950 rivals Core i9-7960X.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 1920Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Integrated GPU
β€”
No
Unlocked
β€”
Yes
AVX-512
β€”
No
Virtualization
β€”
AMD-V
Target Use
β€”
Workstation
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 was priced at $799, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 came in at $999. On launch pricing ($799 vs $999), Ryzen Threadripper 1920 was $200 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 delivers 27.6 pts/$ vs 22.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 β€” making the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 the 22.2% better value option.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 1920Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP
$799-20%
$999
Performance per Dollar
27.6+25%
22.1
Release Date
2017
2017

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.