Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Xeon Gold 6132

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Xeon Gold 6132 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

12 / 24

22,066

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Gold 6132

14 / 28

22,244

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Xeon Gold 6132 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Xeon Gold 6132: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,066 vs 22,244).
❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6132 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6132

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1920 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6132 better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is ahead with a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6132 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 also has the bigger cache pool with 66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6132 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6132 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 6132 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6132 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 28 threads instead of 12/24 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Xeon Gold 6132 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6132

The Xeon Gold 6132 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. L2 cache: 14 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 22,244 points. Launch price was $2,111.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6132 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon Gold 6132 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6132 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6132 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 scores 22,066 against the Xeon Gold 6132's 22,244 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon Gold 6132. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6132.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 1920	Xeon Gold 6132
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	14 / 28+17%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+3%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+23%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB+66%	19.25 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	14 MB+2700%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	22,066	22,244

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6132 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.