Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Xeon W-1370
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Xeon W-1370 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Xeon W-1370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Xeon W-1370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.0 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $323 MSRP).
- ❌125% higher power demand at 180W vs 80W.
Xeon W-1370
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $476 less on MSRP ($323 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 145.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 29.0 PassMark/$ ($323 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 180W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,948 vs 23,150).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 1920X better than Xeon W-1370?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Xeon W-1370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,150 points. Launch price was $799.
Xeon W-1370
The Xeon W-1370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,948 points. Launch price was $362.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-1370 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1370 — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1370 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-1370 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X scores 23,150 against the Xeon W-1370's 22,948 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1370.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+21% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Rocket Lake-S (2021) |
| PassMark | 23,150 | 22,948 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1370 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3r2 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X was priced at $799, while the Xeon W-1370 came in at $323. On launch pricing ($799 vs $323), Xeon W-1370 was $476 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X delivers 29.0 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1370 — making the Xeon W-1370 the 84.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $323-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.0 | 71.0+145% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Xeon W-1370
