Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs Core i5-10400F
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($85) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+404%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($85) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Core i5-10400F
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 54,763 points. Launch price was $1,399.
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 4.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X scores 54,763 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 123.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 34,260 vs 8,191 (122.8% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,270 vs 1,454, a 13.5% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+300% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+5% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+31% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB+967% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 54,763+320% | 13,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 34,260+318% | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,270 | 1,454+14% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 88+450% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 3960X rivals Core i9-10900X; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X launched at $1399 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($85 vs $102), the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is $17 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X delivers 644.3 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X the 133.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1399 | $160-89% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $85-17% | $102 |
| Performance per Dollar | 644.3+405% | 127.7 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Core i5-10400F
