
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Xeon w7-2475X
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs Xeon w7-2475X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs Xeon w7-2475X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs Xeon w7-2475X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $390 less on MSRP ($1,399 MSRP vs $1,789 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.1 vs 29.7 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $1,789 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌24.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 225W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-2475X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon w7-2475X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 280W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅27.3% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (53,211 vs 54,763).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.7 vs 39.1 PassMark/$ ($1,789 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 3960X better than Xeon w7-2475X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs Xeon w7-2475X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 54,763 points. Launch price was $1,399.

Xeon w7-2475X
The Xeon w7-2475X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 53,211 points. Launch price was $1,789.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w7-2475X offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-2475X — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-2475X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon w7-2475X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X scores 54,763 against the Xeon w7-2475X's 53,211 — a 2.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon w7-2475X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Xeon w7-2475X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+20% | 20 / 40 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.8 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+46% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB+241% | 37.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 54,763+3% | 53,211 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 34,260 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,270 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-2475X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X versus 4800 on the Xeon w7-2475X — the Xeon w7-2475X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-2475X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) vs 8 (Xeon w7-2475X). PCIe lanes: 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) vs 112 (Xeon w7-2475X) — the Xeon w7-2475X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) and W790 (Xeon w7-2475X).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Xeon w7-2475X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 4096 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 112+27% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon w7-2475X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w7-2475X). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 3960X rivals Core i9-10900X; Xeon w7-2475X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Xeon w7-2475X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X was priced at $1399, while the Xeon w7-2475X came in at $1789. On launch pricing ($1399 vs $1789), Ryzen Threadripper 3960X was $390 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X delivers 39.1 pts/$ vs 29.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-2475X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X the 27.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Xeon w7-2475X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1399-22% | $1789 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.1+32% | 29.7 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














