Ryzen Threadripper 9960X vs Core i5-10400F
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,419) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Shimada Peak (2025) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+95%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,419) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 9960X and Core i5-10400F
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 92,808 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 20.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X scores 92,808 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 150.8% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 41,000 vs 8,191 (133.4% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,200 vs 1,454, a 75% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,000 vs 5,783 (127.2% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+300% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+23% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+45% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+967% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Shimada Peak (2025) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 92,808+612% | 13,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 41,000+401% | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,200+120% | 1,454 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,000+350% | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+25% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB+700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 88+450% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 9960X targets Content Creation / Rendering, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 9960X rivals Xeon w7-3555; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Content Creation / Rendering | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X launched at $1499 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($1419 vs $102), the Core i5-10400F is $1317 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X delivers 65.4 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 64.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $160-89% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1419 | $102-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4 | 127.7+95% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper 9960X and Core i5-10400F
